3-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
페이지 정보
작성자 Marshall 작성일25-09-05 13:53 조회4회 댓글0건관련링크
본문

False Memory Wave refers to circumstances in which individuals remember events otherwise from the way in which they occurred or, in probably the most dramatic case, remember events that never occurred in any respect. False memories may be very vivid and held with high confidence, and it can be tough to persuade somebody that the Memory Wave Routine in query is unsuitable. Psychologists have studied false memories in laboratory conditions during which events are effectively controlled and it can be known precisely what transpired. Such experiments have uncovered a quantity of factors that are chargeable for creating false memories. In the following few paragraphs some of these components will be reviewed. Generally the issue begins whereas the unique event is still occurring, that is, while the memory is being encoded. If the notion of an occasion is inaccurate, then it can't be remembered accurately (The involved reader can link to fascinating Scholarpedia items on categorical notion and event notion).
Consider the eyewitness who is requested to accurately remember a crime; she may have seen the perpetrator only briefly, at nighttime, from a distance, and whereas experiencing stress - all conditions that reduce her capacity to see him in the first place, which can in turn dramatically cut back her later capability to determine him. False reminiscences may also come up from inferences made throughout an occasion. The witness to a criminal offense is actively attempting to determine what is going on through the occasion, and makes use of prior information to make sense of what is happening. Likewise, the reader interprets short stories while reading them, deciphering simple statements like "Nancy went to the doctor" in a different way if they know the character is anxious about pregnancy (Owens et al. 1979). In each circumstances, making use of information modifications what people remember; the witness might later remember the robbery as extra typical than it was and the reader will misremember the passage to be per the pregnancy theme.
In another simple however highly reliable demonstration, individuals hear a listing of phrases like mattress, relaxation, awake, drained, dream, wake, snooze, blanket, doze, slumber, snore, nap, peace, yawn, drowsy. Later on, individuals declare "sleep" was on the record, regardless that it was not introduced (Roediger et al. 1995). Humans are biased to extract that means from occasions (e.g., that the listing accommodates sleep-related phrases), and this will lead to confusions about what was inferred versus what really occurred. It may also lead to forgetting of non-semantic details, since individuals usually attend extra to which means than to perceptual and phonological particulars. For instance, most individuals fail when requested to attract a penny, though they have dealt with 1000's of pennies; efficiently using a penny does not require one to know the route of Lincoln’s head or the precise wording on the coin (Nickerson et al. Usually recollections are retrieved after time has handed, that means that many events occur after a memory was saved.
Later events might interfere with retrieval of the unique occasion; for instance, Spanish learned in school might come to thoughts when trying to recollect one’s high school French. The eyewitness may learn newspaper accounts about a criminal offense, answer investigator’s questions, talk to other witnesses, and think about the event in her mind’s eye. All of these may yield representations that differ from what truly occurred, and these new recollections could block access to reminiscences of these occasions. Consider a traditional demonstration by which subjects watched a slide present of an automobile accident, which included a slide showing a pink Datsun approaching a yield signal. Later, some members were asked "Did another automotive go the red Datsun whereas it was stopped on the stop sign? " This question contained an incorrect presupposition (that there was a stop sign), and affected later Memory Wave. The subjects’ skill to determine the unique slide (depicting the yield sign) dropped after answering the deceptive question (Loftus et al.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.